Why I Say “Marital Intimacy”

Why do I say “marital intimacy” when counselling couples, or teaching on God’s gift to husbands and wives?  Perhaps I sound old-fashioned.  Actually, I AM old-fashioned. 🙂  But that isn’t the reason I prefer “marital intimacy” or “physical intimacy in marriage” rather than the expression commonly used in society today.

Words Matter

Most people recognise that our thinking affects our words, but we are slow to recognise that our words affect our thinking.  The words we use to describe things come with a wide range of associated thoughts, some conscious, some subconscious.  The words we choose either reinforce or challenge thought patterns.  Thought patterns affect our attitudes, and attitudes impact behaviour.

We live in a society that has perverted God’s gift of intimacy in many ways.  The world’s terminology brings with it a mindset, a way of thinking, which the world has loaded onto that terminology.  When we use the world’s language, we run the risk, even subliminally, of adopting fragments of the world’s  perverse thinking.

The Bible doesn’t tell us specifically what language to use in this area, so this is not a question of obedience, but of wisdom.  We don’t want to reinforce, in ourselves or others, thought patterns and attitudes which are contrary to Scripture.  I’ll give a few reasons why I believe “marital intimacy” is a wiser choice.

The First Reason — Marriage

The world calls physical intimacy “having sex,” but they are just describing an isolated physical action. There is no distinction made, in the world’s terminology, between married and unmarried. They want to isolate the physical act from the marital realm for which God intended it.

The world won’t tell you that part of you dies when you do this outside of marriage, a part that gets killed deader (with apologies to the grammar police) every time you repeat it.  They won’t tell you that you are killing:

  • Part of the close relationship that your Creator wants to have with you
  • Part of your own innocence (and that of the other person)
  • Part of your dreams of being really loved for who you are, rather than for what the other person gets from you
  • Part of your idealism about marriage and love
  • Part of the joy of your eventual wedding night
  • Part of your ability to trust and to be trusted by your eventual spouse
  • Part of your ability to really understand how marriage is a picture of God’s love for you

They won’t tell you that even those who have transgressed, if they stop and wait for marriage, can begin to have at least partial restoration of these things they’ve been killing.

Within a healthy marriage, none of those things die.  In fact, such a marriage can help to restore many things damaged in the past.  Physical intimacy within marriage deserves a different name than the label the world uses for immorality.  The name “marital intimacy” reflects the God-honouring and God-blessed marriage covenant.

The Second Reason — Intimacy

You don’t even have to care about a person to do what the world describes.  You can act for pleasure, and move on.  It doesn’t really matter, according to the world.  “If it feels good, do it.”

God speaks differently.  In Proverbs 5:19, perhaps the most direct Biblical teaching on this aspect of marriage, God used the word “love,” just as He did over and over again in the Song of Solomon.  Elsewhere in Scripture, He uses the word “know,” denoting a close, intimate knowledge, a connection with a person that is much more than physical.

God intended love and deep affection to underlie and pervade the husband / wife relationship.  We become one flesh, bound together in ways far beyond our understanding.  This bonding deserves a better name than the world gives for a mere physical act, a name reflecting close love and affection.  The word “intimacy” serves to describe this aspect of a God-pleasing relationship.

The Third Reason — Giving and Sharing

When you talk about “having” something, your words shift your focus to thinking of taking or possessing it. That largely misses the point of what God intended. The primary focus of I Corinthians 7:3-5 is not about possessing your spouse, but about yielding possession of yourself.

You have to get something to “have” it, but marital intimacy as God intended is not about getting, but about giving.  It is a mutual giving and sharing of the joys God gave us together.  If your mindset in your marriage is on “having” something, you’ve shifted the focus from God’s plan for you and your wife.  You are drifting towards selfishness.

The word “have” (or “having”) is not best for something God intended as “giving” or “sharing.” The world likes that terminology, because the world likes selfishness. We can do better.

The Fourth Reason — Respect

Never underestimate the ability of crass people to find crassness everywhere, of immature people to behave immaturely.  Any terminology we use will be mocked by people of perverse minds.  As Paul told Titus, “Unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure” (Titus 1:15).

We won’t stop disrespect, no matter what term we use.  But those who want to be disrespectful will not choose terminology like “marital intimacy.”  Those who speak casually of (or mock) holy things prefer to use language that does not honour the things they dishonour.  They might mock us for different terminology, but it is better to use different language than the preferred language of those who want to live in the gutter.

I’ll Stick with “Marital Intimacy”

God gave spouses great freedom to enjoy marriage blessings, and they can use whatever language they choose. But what we habitually say can affect our thinking, and the attitudes of our hearers, our children, and others. I prefer terminology reflecting the precious value God placed on this gift, rather than terminology that could as well be applied (and usually is) to all kinds of horrible immorality. I don’t want God’s gift of marriage to be equated with every kind of perversion that the world concocts.

So, in our church or on my blog, if you wonder why I use “old-fashioned” language, I’m seeking to use words that honour what God honours. I’m not afraid of the world’s words, but I hate the attitude they too often convey.

If you want to mentally translate my words into different terms when you hear or read them, it is really none of my business. If you come to me for counsel and use the other words, I’m not going to correct you or think you are wrong. But in general, in speaking or writing, I’ll be talking about ”marital intimacy” (within marriage) and “immorality” (outside of marriage), especially in a public forum.

Note to Parents
The Purposes of Marital Intimacy
Psalm 45, “Greatly Desire Thy Beauty,” and Marital Intimacy
Proverbs 5:19, “Ravished Always,” and Marital Intimacy
Homosexuality and the Purposes of Marital Intimacy

About Jon Gleason

Former Pastor of Free Baptist Church of Glenrothes
This entry was posted in The Christian and Culture and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Why I Say “Marital Intimacy”

  1. Chris Schuttger says:

    And it works the other way also. The world attempts to cover their guilt by sugar coating their words. I believe Christians do a dis-service to each other and the world by not calling sin what it is. Examples like, “having an affair” (that’s NOT a tea party they are talking about), or “hooking up” (as if immoral activity and attitudes was a simple phone call). These words remind me of the fig leaves Adam and Eve sewed for themselves to hide their nakedness. I must hasten to add … using “truthful words” with a holier than thou attitude is not an encouragement or exhortation to those in sin … so while I propose “calling a spade a spade”, I also recognize that our use of words of this nature need to be wrapped in grace. Our heart purpose should be to win sinning brothers back to pleasing our Lord and clearly communicating the eternal deathly impact of sin to the lost.

    • Jon Gleason says:

      Hello, Chris. Good comment, good expansion of the principle. The world uses language that tears down that which is good and excuses or exalts that which is bad. We need to do the opposite.

  2. alcoramdeo says:

    Among generally excellent posts, this one stands out as “wonderfully Christ honoring,” which was my comment introducing my FaceBook posting of the link to it.
    Many thanks, Brother Jon.

  3. Brian says:

    Greatly appreciate this post, Jon! Conducting my first wedding in a few short weeks so this was very timely. I would like to print this for the engaged couple to add to the material they already have.

  4. Excellent article. I even posted it on Facebook.

  5. robert e. stewart says:

    Should marital intimacy have an age limit?

    • Jon Gleason says:

      Hello, Robert. This went into moderation while the blog was dormant, I apologise for the delay.

      Scripture does not directly address this question. It is clearly not appropriate for children. As for an older age limit, matters of health and in some cases, kindness and care for one’s spouse, may intervene, but there is certainly no hard and fast age limit.

Comments welcome! (but please check the comment policy)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s