No Belief Needed?

This year’s Moderator of the Church of Scotland wrote an article worthy of his Kirk titled, “Doctrine Getting in the Way of Faith.”

In the world of “respectful dialogues” that I have called for during my year as moderator I would encourage women and men across the Church to engage in serious conversations with those whose connection to the Church, and with it their connection to the faith, has simply ebbed away. Ask what would reignite their interest in belonging to the community of faith. Do not assert that their belonging depends on their ability to tick certain boxes of belief, but ask what would make it possible for them to break into the circle of your church. Then invite your minister and kirk session to make space for respectful dialogue with the spiritual refugees of several generations.

Don’t insist on belief before belonging – faith comes with belonging. I know that in my own life experience the most assured connection with Christ is in the context of being part of the community which is his body.

This may all sound good, but there is no Biblical basis for his statement.  If the Moderator’s “most assured connection with Christ” is not rooted solely in a belief in the truths of Scripture, then he has no sure foundation and nothing to offer anyone that will give them anything more than a few good feelings.

We’ll go through some of this and see what the Bible says.  Contra the Moderator, the Scripture doesn’t tell us faith comes with belonging, it comes by a work of the Spirit through the hearing of the Word of God:

John 3:8

The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.

Romans 10:14, 17

14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

According to Scripture, people belong to the church when they receive the truth and are saved, and belief is necessary to salvation:

Acts 2:41-47

41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.

47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.

Ephesians 2:8

For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

Doctrine is not contrasted with faith, it is essential.  If you don’t have the doctrine of Christ, you don’t have God:

II John 1:9

Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

You cannot truly belong to a true church without belief in true doctrine.  Either you are a fraud, pretending to believe and to belong, or the church is a fraud, pretending to be a church while telling you that failure to believe the truth doesn’t matter.

Unfortunately, Mr Chalmers article tells all we need to know about him and the “church” he leads.  Articles from Kirk leaders rarely cite much, if any Scripture — when they do, they misuse it.  The Kirk is simply not founded on the Scriptures anymore.  It has become a mere social club with a veneer of faux morality (defined by opinion, not Scripture) and God-talk.  Its religiosity attempts to cover, but never really hides, the cracks and the decay, the politics and power-grabbing and pursuit of human approval.  Its foolish attempts at societal relevance render it spiritually irrelevant, and thus its societal relevance is also collapsing.  Its form of godliness has for years been accompanied by a denial of the power of true godliness, just as Paul described in II Timothy 3:5.

The Bible certainly encourages us to welcome unbelievers who choose to come to the meetings of the church.  But it does not tell us to consider them part of the church or act as if belief is an “extra” that is less than a requirement to being a true member of a true church.  Anyone who teaches that doctrine gets in the way of faith is, at best, horribly confused and shouldn’t be teaching, and at worst, a liar.  II John, cited above, could not be more clear.

Addendum:

I see David Robertson of Dundee St Peter’s has also addressed this.  It is a good article (and can be commented on at his own blog):

Instead of presenting this confused, boring, old-fashioned liberal ‘church without belief in God’ message, as though it were something new, the Moderator would do better to return to the faith of his forefathers and start proclaiming the Good News of Christ as given in his Word. ‘Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved’ is the message that Scotland needs to hear. Not “come and get a nice warm fuzzy ‘spiritual’ feeling with us”. For that they would be better going to the pub/club/football stadium or atheist church! The Christian faith is much more radical and life changing.

(Interestingly, his entire article sounds almost like a Baptist refuting infant baptism.  How does a minister who follows the Westminster Confession oppose bringing people who don’t believe into the church?  That’s what infant baptism does, if we believe the Westminster Confession, which the Free Church affirms as their statement of belief.  But perhaps further discussion of that is best left for another day. 🙂 For now, I appreciated his article, which hit the nail on the head regarding the bankrupt philosophy behind Mr Chalmers’ comments.)

About Jon Gleason

Pastor of Free Baptist Church of Glenrothes
This entry was posted in Thoughts on the News and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to No Belief Needed?

  1. Fraser Munro says:

    I met a man the other year who had been a Church of Scotland minister but who had become an atheist. He still received and accepted invitations to take Church Services!

    • Jon Gleason says:

      I’ve heard other very similar stories, Fraser. Undoubtedly he could put on a good religious performance, which is all that is really required for the Kirk, I guess.

  2. The Unitarian Universalist Church is all about believing whatever you want to believe or not believe.

  3. Very sad, this Kirk is obviously not a Christian man and needs to repent before God shows him that doctrine is important and throws him into hell forever because He knows not God.

    • Jon Gleason says:

      Hello, Dale. It is indeed hard to see how any true believer could say the things he has said. Those who have Christ abide in His doctrine, and what this man espouses is not Christ’s teaching.

      Unfortunately, apostasy has taken a very strong hold throughout the Scottish Kirk. This is but one of many symptoms.

Comments welcome! (but please check the comment policy)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s