Eight More Thoughts on Joseph

Part One: “Minded to Put Her Away Privily

Part Two: Another Quick Thought on Joseph

  1. After Joseph decided to go ahead and take Mary as his wife, his reputation was in the dirt.  Most people would assume that either he was the father and had been immoral, or that he wasn’t the father and Mary had played him for a fool.  Since we know Joseph was a person who thought about things, he would have known this, but he took Mary as his wife anyway.
  2. When Joseph had dreams from God, he obeyed immediately when he woke up, at least once in the middle of the night (Matthew 2:13-14).  Joseph wasn’t one to wait until it was convenient or easy to obey.  (He probably also acted in the night in Matthew 1:24 — Mary, like Joseph, would have been in some turmoil over their relationship, and he doesn’t seem the kind of man who would keep her waiting to let her know about the angel’s message to him.  He probably was over there telling her father, “Sir, tell Mary an angel appeared to me, too, and we’re completing this marriage as soon as we can!”  “Go away, son, and come back tomorrow morning.  It’s the middle of the night!  Crazy kids!” 🙂 I know, I know, the Bible doesn’t say this, but we should see Joseph and Mary as real people with real thoughts, emotions, and reactions, and not cardboard figures in a nativity scene.)
  3. Joseph was a man of great self-control.  We can see by all his actions how much he loved Mary, and so his normal desire for physical intimacy must have been strong.  He took Mary as his wife, and by normal standards need not have waited until after the Child was born, but the Bible tells us clearly that he did wait.
  4. It was dangerous to be Joseph.  Everyone knew that Herod the Great was a paranoid killer who murdered his own sons when he thought they were a threat — and Joseph was the heir to the throne of David.  Yet, Joseph still took Mary and Jesus to the temple in Jerusalem (Luke 2:21 & following), in keeping with the Old Testament Law, even after “loud-mouthed shepherds” (my term) had “made known abroad” (Luke 2:17-18) about the Child they had seen.  Obedience wasn’t optional for Joseph even if it seemed dangerous.
  5. Joseph must have been a little fearful of staying in Bethlehem, so close to Jerusalem, but God had arranged (by the decree of Augustus) for him to be there when Christ was born, so he stayed until God moved him.
  6. Joseph must have wondered just how many “loud-mouths” there were going to be when the wise men started talk all over Jerusalem about his family (Matthew 2:1-3).  Yet, these “loud-mouths” served at least three purposes.  First, they were a witness against those who would later reject their Messiah, both as to His birth and its location.  Later, the religious leaders might scorn Him as a Nazarene, but the true place of His birth was no secret.  Second, the wise men were an additional confirmation for those who believed.  Third, they brought provision for Joseph’s need (see my next point).  Sometimes the very thing which seems bad to us may be the very thing we needed.
  7. Joseph was poor (the offering mentioned in Luke 2:24 is the poor man’s alternative), and he wasn’t “white van man” with a convenient vehicle to transport his carpentry tools to Bethlehem, and then on to Egypt.  How was he going to provide for his family?  He acted in faith, no doubt trusting God to enable him to work somehow, and God sent wise men with expensive gifts which would have greatly helped with the financial needs of the journey.
  8. Joseph was the father of “James the Just”, the author of the Biblical book of James.  According to Josephus, this man was so godly that many Jews believed the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. came as a punishment for the murder of James.  Another brother was Jude, so Joseph’s natural sons provided two of the books of the Bible.  Although the Bible tells us Jesus’ brothers did not at first believe in Him, perhaps we can see the godly influence of Joseph in what his sons eventually became.

Update:  Russell Moore has some of the same thoughts on Joseph, and some others as well.  (HT: News for Christians)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thought for the Holidays….

… as we enjoy special pleasures at this time of year.

Warren Wiersbe:

We are so glutted with luxuries that we have forgotten how to enjoy our necessities.

Posted in Quick Thoughts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

It’s Tough Being a Student

Or so my daughter wants me to think….

Posted in Just for Fun | Leave a comment

Defining Christianity: Cameron vs Christ

I mentioned this Sunday, but I’ll mention it here, too.

Prime Minister David Cameron:

I am a committed — but I have to say vaguely practicing — Church of England Christian.

Jesus Christ:

And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me.
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.

And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.

I am thankful David Cameron has good things to say about Christianity’s positive effects on society.  I pray he will be a good leader of the United Kingdom — but he describes a relatively benign version of “Cultural Christianity”, one that is far from real faith.

The Founder of our faith calls for much more than “vaguely practiced” Christianity.    There is nothing vague about the claims of Christ, nothing indefinite about what He requires from those who follow Him, and the value of our Christianity is measured by our faithfulness to Him, not by words accompanied by vague practice.

A person may approve or disapprove of aspects of David Cameron’s political policies, but a version of Christianity that ignores the teachings of Jesus Christ is worthless.

Posted in Thoughts on the News | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Thy Word is Truth

“That Book in Your Hand”

The first sermon in this series on the nature of the Bible was on the inspiration of the Scriptures, their divine nature, from II Timothy 3:16 (summarised discussion with links here). The second sermon was on how the Spirit moved in giving us the Scriptures, from II Peter 1:19-21 (summarised discussion with links here).

In this post I’ll deal with thoughts related to my third sermon, which looked at what is commonly called “inerrancy”, the complete reliability of God’s Word, and why it matters to us.

Is God’s Word true?  How can a Book be without error when it talks about rabbits chewing their cud?

Continue reading

Posted in Bibliology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are Your “Feet of Clay” Showing?

I’m going to leave names out of this, because I want to focus on the statement.

This goes back to about 25 years ago.  I was talking to one of my professors and expressed my great respect for the character and godliness of one of his colleagues.  I’ve never forgotten his response.  He paused, thought a moment, and said:

We all have feet of clay, but I’ve worked with Dr S for almost ten years, and I’ve never seen his. (emphasis mine)

Most of us have put our faults, our weakness, our sin, fully on display far too often.

Something to think about for your Saturday.

Posted in Quick Thoughts | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Statement from Tesco / Lesson for Christians

Yesterday, I mentioned what the Christian Institute had reported about Nick Lansley, the head of R & D at Tesco.  Later, I mentioned that he had removed the statement.

This has generated a LOT of activity on this blog.  So since for some reason many people are coming here (of all places) for this, I thought it was only right to ask Tesco’s press office if they had made a statement.  Their response:

This is Mr Lansley’s personal opinion and does not reflect the views and opinions of Tesco.

Fair enough — I don’t vet my blog posts with my employer, after all.  If the views of their head of Research & Development were my only concern with Tesco, I probably wouldn’t let it affect my shopping decisions.  (I might add, though, that until I phoned, they had issued no statement dissociating themselves from his comments, though they were obviously aware of the issue.)

But for Christians, there is a reminder here.  No man is an island to himself, and what we say and do will reflect on others who are associated with us.  Mr Lansley has “Tesco” associated with his name — that’s the only reason what he said really matters much to anyone except his friends and family.  Even if Tesco does not approve of or agree with his statements, they got “tarred with the same brush,” fairly or unfairly.

If you are a Christian, because “Christian” is associated with your name, what you do will reflect on Christ, whether He approves of it or not.  If we do what pleases Him, it will bring honour to His name, and if we do poorly, it will bring mocking and scorn to the One who loved us enough to die for us.  What are my actions and words saying about Christ?

Some Christians, when they hear of this matter, will allow themselves to become angry against a man they’ve never met.  That is both contrary to Scripture and a huge waste of energy.  We would do much better to pray for him, and better still to consider what lessons the Lord would have us learn in our own personal lives.  A “Christian Soldier” is not on a campaign against those who are opposed to what we believe.  He is on a campaign to become what his God wants him to be.  Our biggest concern should not be, “How is that other person doing?” but rather, “How am I doing?”

NOTE:  For those outside of the UK and unfamiliar with Tesco, it is by far the largest retailer in the UK.  According to Wikipedia, it the third largest in the world, measured by revenue, and the second largest (behind Walmart) measured by profits.

Update: Tesco’s sales dropped over Christmas compared to last year, while their rivals saw an increase.

Posted in Thoughts on the News | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments